Andrx Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. GlaxoSmithKline, PLC
The law firm of Isicoff Ragatz & Koenigsberg (Miami) retained Campos & Stratis, on behalf of the plaintiff, to provide an opinion of damages arising from the alleged infringement of U.S. patent 6,905,708 titled, Controlled Release Oral Dosage Form. Campos & Stratis provided lost profit and reasonable royalty damage analyses, submitted a Rule 26 expert report and gave deposition testimony. The case settled favorably for Andrx.

Clinical Innovations, Inc. v. Tyco Healthcare Group, LP
The law firm of Parsons Behle & Latimer, PC, (Salt Lake City) retained Campos & Stratis, on behalf of the plaintiff, to provide an opinion of damages arising from the alleged infringement of U.S. patent number 6,231,524 titled, Pressure Catheter Device with Enhanced Fluid Monitoring Features. Campos & Stratis provided lost profit and reasonable royalty damage analyses, and submitted a Rule 26 expert report. The case settled.

Electromotive, Inc. v. Mercury Marine (Brunswick Corporation)
The law firm of Nixon & Vanderhye, PC, (Washington D.C.) retained Campos & Stratis, on behalf of the plaintiff, to provide an opinion of damages arising from the alleged infringement of U.S. patent Re. 34,183 titled, Ignition Control System for Internal Combustion Engines with Simplified Crankshaft Sensing and Improved Coil Charging. Campos & Stratis provided lost profit and reasonable royalty damage analyses, submitted a Rule 26 expert report, and gave testimony at trial. The jury found for the plaintiff.

Baden Sports, Inc. v. Molten Corporation
The law firm of Vantage Law, PLLC, (Seattle) retained Campos & Stratis, on behalf of the plaintiff, to provide an opinion of damages arising from the alleged infringement of U.S. patent 5,636,835 titled, Inflatable Ball, and unfair competition. Campos & Stratis provided lost profit and reasonable royalty damage analyses, and submitted a Rule 26 expert report. The jury found for the plaintiff.

Litecubes, LLC v. Northern Light Products dba GlowProducts
The law firm of Christensen O'Connor Johnson Kindness, PLLC, (Seattle) retained Campos & Stratis, on behalf of the defendant, to provide an opinion of damages resulting from the alleged infringement of U.S. patent 6,416,198 titled, Illuminatable Beverage Accessory Device, a novelty ice cube. Campos & Stratis provided a Rule 26 expert report, and deposition and trial testimony. The jury found willful infringement with zero damages based on testimony.

Hawaii International v. Mommy Gina Tuna Resources
The law firm of Cades Schutte, LLP, (Honolulu) retained Campos & Stratis, on behalf of the plaintiff, to provide opinion on damages arising from the alleged infringement of U.S. patent 5,972,401 titled, Process for Manufacturing Tasteless Super-Purified Smoke for Treating Seafood to be Frozen and Thawed. Campos & Stratis provided lost profit and reasonable royalty damage analyses, and submitted a Rule 26 expert report. The case is ongoing.

Clock Springs, Inc. v. WrapMaster, Inc.
The law firm of Reed Smith (Philadelphia) retained Campos & Stratis, on behalf of the plaintiff, to provide an opinion of damages arising from the alleged infringement of U.S. patent 6,336,983 titled, Method of and Apparatus for Reinforcing Pipe. The invention involved a high tensile composite coil used to repair pressurized pipelines. Campos & Stratis provided lost profit and reasonable royalty damage analyses in a Rule 26 expert report. The case settled favorably for Clock Springs.

Nicholas V. Perricone, MD v. Medicis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The law firm of Reed Smith (Philadelphia) retained Campos & Stratis, on behalf of the defendant, to provide an opinion of damages arising from the alleged infringement of U.S. patent 5,409,693 titled, Method for Treating and Preventing Sunburn and Sunburn Damage to the Skin and U.S. patent 5,574,063 titled, Method and Compositions for Topical Application of Ascorbic Acid Fatty Acid Ester for Treatment and/or Prevention of Skin Damage. Campos & Stratis provided lost profit and reasonable royalty damage analyses, which incorporated a royalty cap based upon the cost to design around the patent, and submitted a Rule 26 expert report. In addition, Campos & Stratis provided deposition testimony. The case ended with summary judgment for Medicis.

TouchTunes Music Corp. v. Ecast, Inc.
The law firm of Nixon & Vanderhye, PC, (Washington D.C.) retained Campos & Stratis, on behalf of the plaintiff, to calculate damages arising from the alleged infringement of U.S. patent 6,308,204 titled, Method of Communications for an Intelligent Digital Audiovisual Playback System. Campos & Stratis provided a Rule 26 expert report and provided deposition testimony. The case settled favorably for TouchTunes before trial.

Rollerblade, Inc. v. K2 Corporation
The law firm of Black Lowe & Graham, PLLC, (Seattle) retained Campos & Stratis, on behalf of the defendant, to provide an opinion of damages arising from the alleged infringement of U.S. patents 5,848,796 and 6,139,030 both titled, In-Line Roller Skate. Campos & Stratis provided lost profit and reasonable royalty damage analyses, and submitted a Rule 26 expert report. The case settled with cross licensing.

K2 Corporation v. Desert Extrusion, Inc.
The law firm of Black Lowe & Graham, PLLC, (Seattle) retained Campos & Stratis, on behalf of the plaintiff, and its subsidiary, Shakespeare Company, to provide an opinion of damages from the alleged infringement of U.S. patent 6,109,005 titled, Method of Packaging a Coiled Trimmer Line. Campos & Stratis provided a Rule 26 expert rebuttal report. The case settled.

Triple K, Inc. v. Zacklift, Inc.
The law firm Christensen O'Connor Johnson & Kindness, PLLC, (Seattle) retained Campos & Stratis, on behalf of the defendant, to calculate damages arising from the alleged infringement of U.S. patent 5,823,735 titled, Attaching a Wheel Lift Apparatus to a Road Tractor, and U.S. patent 6,036,428 titled, System For Attaching a Towing Apparatus to a Road Tractor. Campos & Stratis submitted a Rule 26 expert report that included a reasonable royalty calculation, incorporating a royalty cap based on the cost to design around the patent. The case settled favorably for Zacklift before trial.

Data Treasury Corporation v. Ingenico, Inc., et al.
The law firm Nixon & Vanderhye, PC, (Washington D.C.) retained Campos & Stratis, on behalf of the defendant, to provide an opinion of damages arising from the alleged infringement of U.S. patent 5,910,988 and 6,032,137 both titled, Remote Image Capture with Centralized Processing and Storage. Campos & Stratis provided lost profit and reasonable royalty damage analyses, submitted a Rule 26 expert report and gave deposition testimony. The case settled favorably for Ingenico before trial.

Ebberts v. Harris Research, Inc. dba Chem-Dry
The law firm of Kirton & McConkie, PC, (Salt Lake City) retained Campos & Stratis, on behalf of the plaintiff, to provide an opinion of damages arising from the alleged infringement of U.S. patent 6,126,697 titled, Multiple Carbonate Cleaning Compound, and U.S. patent 6,554,207 titled, Application Apparatus for Multiple Solution Cleaner. Campos & Stratis provided a Rule 26 expert report and deposition testimony. The case settled before trial.

Hawaii International v. Ocean Duke Corporation
The law firm of Cades Schutte, LLP, (Honolulu) retained Campos & Stratis, on behalf of the plaintiff, to provide opinion on damages arising from the alleged infringement of U.S. patent 5,972,401 titled, Process for Manufacturing Tasteless Super-Purified Smoke for Treating Seafood to be Frozen and Thawed. Campos & Stratis provided lost profit and reasonable royalty damage analyses, submitted a Rule 26 expert report, and deposition testimony. The case is ongoing.

Karen Umbrella Company, Ltd., v. Yeh Hung Company, Ltd., et al.
The law firm of Wang and Patel (Los Angeles) retained Campos & Stratis, on behalf of the plaintiff, to provide an opinion of damages arising from the alleged infringement of U.S. patent 6,152,156 titled, Sunshade With A Tiltable Canopy. Campos & Stratis provided a Rule 26 expert report and a supplement report. The case settled before trial.

Dr. Myer Coval v. Green Cross, Inc.
The law firm Nixon & Vanderhye, PC, (Washington D.C.) retained Campos & Stratis on behalf of the plaintiff, to provide an opinion of damages arising from the alleged infringement of U.S. patents 4,093,606 and 4,165,370. The patented technology covered methods of commercially separating gamma globulin. Campos & Stratis provided lost profit and reasonable royalty damage analyses, and submitted a Rule 26 expert report. The case settled favorably for Dr. Coval during trial.

Life Time Tables v. FDL Tables, Inc.
The law firm of Baker & Daniels (Indianapolis) retained Campos & Stratis, on behalf of the defendant, to review and comment on the alleged infringement of U.S. patent 6,431,092 titled, Portable folding utility table with center support assembly and U.S. patent 6,530,331 titled, Portable folding utility table with integral receiving members. Campos & Stratis assisted with discovery requests and depositions. The case settled before the exchange of expert reports.